首页> 外文OA文献 >k-t accelerated aortic 4D flow MRI in under two minutes: Feasibility and impact of resolution, k-space sampling patterns, and respiratory navigator gating on hemodynamic measurements
【2h】

k-t accelerated aortic 4D flow MRI in under two minutes: Feasibility and impact of resolution, k-space sampling patterns, and respiratory navigator gating on hemodynamic measurements

机译:在两分钟内完成k-t加速主动脉4D流动MRI:分辨率,k空间采样模式和呼吸导航门控对血流动力学测量的可行性和影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To assess the performance of highly accelerated free-breathing aortic four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI acquired in under 2 minutes compared to conventional respiratory gated 4D flow. Eight k-t accelerated nongated 4D flow MRI (parallel MRI with extended and averaged generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition kernels [PEAK GRAPPA], R = 5, TRes = 67.2 ms) using four ky -kz Cartesian sampling patterns (linear, center-out, out-center-out, random) and two spatial resolutions (SRes1 = 3.5 × 2.3 × 2.6 mm3 , SRes2 = 4.5 × 2.3 × 2.6 mm3 ) were compared in vitro (aortic coarctation flow phantom) and in 10 healthy volunteers, to conventional 4D flow (16 mm-navigator acceptance window; R = 2; TRes = 39.2 ms; SRes = 3.2 × 2.3 × 2.4 mm3 ). The best k-t accelerated approach was further assessed in 10 patients with aortic disease. The k-t accelerated in vitro aortic peak flow (Qmax), net flow (Qnet), and peak velocity (Vmax) were lower than conventional 4D flow indices by ≤4.7%, ≤ 11%, and ≤22%, respectively. In vivo k-t accelerated acquisitions were significantly shorter but showed a trend to lower image quality compared to conventional 4D flow. Hemodynamic indices for linear and out-center-out k-space samplings were in agreement with conventional 4D flow (Qmax ≤ 13%, Qnet ≤ 13%, Vmax ≤ 17%, P > 0.05). Aortic 4D flow MRI in under 2 minutes is feasible with moderate underestimation of flow indices. Differences in k-space sampling patterns suggest an opportunity to mitigate image artifacts by an optimal trade-off between scan time, acceleration, and k-space sampling. Magn Reson Med 79:195-207, 2018. © 2018 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
机译:为了评估与常规呼吸门控4D流相比,在2分钟内获得的高度加速的自由呼吸主动脉四维(4D)流MRI的性能。使用四个ky -kz直角坐标采样模式(线性,中心向外,向外,向外),进行八节kt加速非门控4D流MRI(具有扩展的和平均的,自动校正的部分并行采集内核[PEAK GRAPPA],R = 5,TRes = 67.2 ms的并行MRI) -中心向外随机)和两个空间分辨率(SRes1 = 3.5×2.3×2.6 mm3,SRes2 = 4.5×2.3×2.6 mm3)进行了体外比较(主动脉缩窄流幻影),并在10名健康志愿者中与常规4D流进行了比较(16mm导航仪接受窗口; R = 2; TRes = 39.2 ms; SRes = 3.2×2.3×2.4 mm3)。在10名主动脉疾病患者中进一步评估了最佳的k-t加速方法。 k-t加速体外主动脉峰值流量(Qmax),净流量(Qnet)和峰值速度(Vmax)分别比常规4D流量指标低≤4.7%,≤11%和≤22%。与传统的4D流程相比,体内k-t加速采集的时间明显缩短,但显示出图像质量降低的趋势。线性和偏心k空间采样的血流动力学指数与常规4D流量一致(Qmax≤13%,Qnet≤13%,Vmax≤%17%,P> 0.05)。在2分钟内进行主动脉4D流动MRI是可行的,但流量指数会被低估。 k空间采样模式的差异表明,可以通过在扫描时间,加速度和k空间采样之间进行最佳折衷来减轻图像伪影的机会。 Magn Reson Med 79:195-207,2018.©2018国际磁共振医学学会

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号